bandnerd218 wrote:and i though robert pattison was a bad choice for edward. i think he's ugly, but that's just me
bandnerd218 wrote:bella's acting was awful. ewards was realy bad a lot of the time too. his voice wasnt velvety enough [i know im being pickey, but whatver]
Jasper looked constipated the entire time.
the bad vamps were in it to much
the ballet studio was too big
the cullen's house was cool, but not like in the book.
eric was really out of character
Rosalie seamed too jealous and angry
the bad vamps wardrobe was a mess
bell's dress for the dance was kind of sad
bella's cast was thy high. she broke her knee..
Laurent was supposed to be an olive skined Frenchman. not Jamaican looking
and i though robert pattison was a bad choice for edward. i think he's ugly, but that's just me
Emmet, while not COMPLETELY like book Emmet, was awesome
Charlie acted well, although it wasnt how i pictured him
Charlies house was house i pictured it.
sry i was nitpickey
MissWhitlock wrote:I think that maybe, my expectations were too high, or something. I totally expected more from Catherine Hardwicke, cause from what I've heard, she was good and I thought Stephenie Meyer wouldn't let them ruin the movie.
All in all, I think this movie is, by far, the worst I've ever seen in my entire life. Don't get me wrong, I Loooove the books (apart from Breaking Dawn that was such a let down) but dude, this movie is just... its more disappointing than Breaking Dawn.
What I didnt like-
They got pretty much every character wrong. They made Edward seem like some weird creepy stalker guy and not "from a different' time at all. His acting was really bad
And Bella's acting is WAY off, and she blinks alot. She tries too hard to be all melodramatic and stuff, it annoys me, plus, she sounds like a guy when she's angry.
Alice was a bit...not alice. If you know what I mean. She was supposed to be all bubbly and happy and jumpy and spaz but in the movie she was like...held back a bit.
Jasper had a grand total of 3 lines.
Emmett wasn't like book Emmett, he was still funny though but, whatever.
What's with Jacob's hair?
What's with Jacob? He looks...weird. Not like I imagined him to be.
I was looking forward to seeing the meadow. But, yet again, it's a let down. Going to the meadow was supposed to be one of the highlights in the movie, instead they just made it seem like it was just a random place. Edward was supposed to PLAN this first right? and, in the book, before they ran for the meadow, wasnt edward wearing that white unbottoned shirt of his, and it was one of those intense moments where Bella's like, dazzled. i really wanted to see that bit, see his sparkly girth but, noooooo. And then the actual set of the meadow's pretty crap too.
Esme had...no lines.
Victoria's hair isnt even that flaming red. It looks blonde! And what's with the fur thing? Jeez.
Laurent is black? Didn't know vampires CAN be black...how is that possible?
Edward is realllly hairy. And their eyes arent as pronounced (is that the right word) or... Stand-outish... as I thought they would be.
I seriously could go on but I won't..
What I liked-
The pepper spray! LOL!
Jasper's face! BAHA!
I had a really good laugh at the really bad special effects. Especially that part where James like, flies over bella in the ballet studio. Classic xD
Rosalie's acting was REALLY good! I like her now. And her shoes.
So, the movie is nothing compared to the books. I did not see the point of this movie, it was crap anyway. How can Stephenie let them do this to her work? Seriously. They completely rewrote the whole thing, its like a new story. And, if I hadn't read the books, I would probably be like, twilight is gay, i won't read it, so it sends the wrong message to non-readers.
I dont know, maybe, i'm picky or complain alot, or maybe nothings good enough for me but, come on. I dont see how anyone could LIKE this movie.
MissWhitlock wrote:Laurent is black? Didn't know vampires CAN be black...how is that possible?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests