Zoika94 wrote:[color=#BF4080]i agree with u all and xxtopaz (i read ur msg by highliting it) u r absolutley rite!!!! i guess edward was rite to call him son....but it was kind of awkward.......i mean hes only 2 yrs songer than bella...... oh well. watever!!!!!!WE STILL LUV EDWARD CULLEN!!!!! NO MATTER WAT!!!! though im still switzerland!!! im nuetral!!!! i luv both vamp and werewolfe. though i knew edward would get bella.[code][/code]
Clearly Edward puts Bella outside of some of his perceptions. Because like I said earlier, he refers to all of Bella's classmates and even Jacob in book one as a child/children, conveniently leaving Bella out of that category.