Twilight Saga Q&A

Re: Twilight Saga Q&A

Postby Esme echo » Sat Nov 15, 2008 6:44 pm

I don't think either one of them is stupid. Vulnerable, perhaps. Definately not stupid.

Regarding Bella saying that Edward killed James: she may have just been abbreviating the situation. Edward was responsible for James being killed. That was enough for Victoria, and instead of going into the longer version, Bella went for the simplified facts.
"Where there is great love, there are always miracles."
Esme echo
Hanging Up on Jessica
 
Posts: 636
Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2008 3:51 pm

Re: Twilight Saga Q&A

Postby MRK » Sat Nov 15, 2008 7:57 pm

Esme echo wrote:I don't think either one of them is stupid. Vulnerable, perhaps. Definately not stupid.

Regarding Bella saying that Edward killed James: she may have just been abbreviating the situation. Edward was responsible for James being killed. That was enough for Victoria, and instead of going into the longer version, Bella went for the simplified facts.

Thats how I took it.
Image
User avatar
MRK
Fishing with Charlie
 
Posts: 890
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 3:02 pm

Re: Twilight Saga Q&A

Postby *Wanderer* » Sun Nov 16, 2008 12:46 am

Edward_Addict wrote:Thanks for answering my questions :) but I think you guys might be misunderstanding what I meant with #1...
I understand why Victoria goes after Bella, but I don't understand why during the series Bella refers to Edward as the one who killed James, when Edward told her in the hospital at the end of Twilight that Emmett and Jasper are the ones who "took care of him." Anytime James is brought up later, there is never any reference (even in Bella's thoughts) that Emmett and Jasper are the ones who killed James, NOT Edward. I just found that a little inconsistent.


Despite what everyone else says, I think that later it is said that Edward is the one that killed James is because Edward is the one that arranged how the killing of James/protecting of Bella went down. Does that make sense?

Even though I could be wrong and it could just be a mistake like everyone is saying.... Everyone makes mistakes!

Love,
*Wanderer*
Last edited by *Wanderer* on Mon Nov 17, 2008 1:25 am, edited 1 time in total.
*Wanderer*
Ignoring Renee's E-Mails
 
Posts: 713
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2008 9:37 pm
Location: <3!

Re: Twilight Saga Q&A

Postby waiting tobe dazzled » Sun Nov 16, 2008 5:08 am

*Wanderer* wrote:
Edward_Addict wrote:Thanks for answering my questions :) but I think you guys might be misunderstanding what I meant with #1...
I understand why Victoria goes after Bella, but I don't understand why during the series Bella refers to Edward as the one who killed James, when Edward told her in the hospital at the end of Twilight that Emmett and Jasper are the ones who "took care of him." Anytime James is brought up later, there is never any reference (even in Bella's thoughts) that Emmett and Jasper are the ones who killed James, NOT Edward. I just found that a little inconsistent.


Despite what everyone else says, I think that later it is said that Edward is the one that killed James is because Edward is the one that arranged how the killing of James/protecting of Bella went down. Does that make sense?

Even though I could be wrong and it could just be a mistake like everyone is saying.... Everyone makes mistakes!

Love,
*Wanderer*


I agree ^
Because he went after Bella, James was killed.
I don't think it was a mistake on SM's part, I agree with somene above me (Esme Echo I think), that it was just easier then saying Edward fell in love with me and because I smell good James came after me and then almost killed me and on Edward's orders, James was killed by his brothers.
Image
Avatar by allieb
Field Supervisor of EDC, Inc.
Team Edward-Knight in Shining Volvo
Team Rosalie-Every Rose has it's thorn
Cotton Candy Revolutionists~Jell-O Wars of 09’
User avatar
waiting tobe dazzled
Has Caught Sight of Edward
 
Posts: 1014
Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2008 10:56 pm
Location: Looking for Emmett in East Tennessee

Re: Twilight Saga Q&A

Postby edward4ever » Sun Nov 16, 2008 11:35 am

waiting tobe dazzled wrote:
*Wanderer* wrote:
Edward_Addict wrote:Thanks for answering my questions :) but I think you guys might be misunderstanding what I meant with #1...
I understand why Victoria goes after Bella, but I don't understand why during the series Bella refers to Edward as the one who killed James, when Edward told her in the hospital at the end of Twilight that Emmett and Jasper are the ones who "took care of him." Anytime James is brought up later, there is never any reference (even in Bella's thoughts) that Emmett and Jasper are the ones who killed James, NOT Edward. I just found that a little inconsistent.


Despite what everyone else says, I think that later it is said that Edward is the one that killed James is because Edward is the one that arranged how the killing of James/protecting of Bella went down. Does that make sense?

Even though I could be wrong and it could just be a mistake like everyone is saying.... Everyone makes mistakes!

Love,
*Wanderer*


I agree ^
Because he went after Bella, James was killed.
I don't think it was a mistake on SM's part, I agree with somene above me (Esme Echo I think), that it was just easier then saying Edward fell in love with me and because I smell good James came after me and then almost killed me and on Edward's orders, James was killed by his brothers.


What you all said above is EXACTLY how I looked at it until the question was raised, then I looked at it analytically and was like, "Hmmm, they're right!" I'm such a follower... :cry:

Sooo, I'm gonna follow you guys back to where I was before. :? :lol:
Edward's Honeymoon Night Extra
Honeymoon Night Extra
Two feather pillows--$75
One headboard--$220
Spending 17 days alone on Isle Esme with Edward Cullen--PRICELESS!
User avatar
edward4ever
Helping Mike to Get a Clue
 
Posts: 529
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 6:41 pm

Re: Twilight Saga Q&A

Postby Katelyn » Sun Nov 16, 2008 6:24 pm

Didn't Edward get to the dance studio before the rest of his family?maybe he got to James first and Jasper and Emmett just finished him off? Coz vampires have to be torn apart then burned dont they? I don't know maybe Im totally wrong!I got the impression that Edward rescued Bella than jasper and Emmett finished James off..
Life sucks and then you die..yeah I should be so lucky.

You. Got. Food. In. My. Hair.
User avatar
Katelyn
Settled in Forks
 
Posts: 9
Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2008 5:23 pm
Location: Ireland

Re: Twilight Saga Q&A

Postby runswithwolves » Sun Nov 16, 2008 6:28 pm

Katelyn wrote:Didn't Edward get to the dance studio before the rest of his family?maybe he got to James first and Jasper and Emmett just finished him off? Coz vampires have to be torn apart then burned dont they? I don't know maybe Im totally wrong!I got the impression that Edward rescued Bella than jasper and Emmett finished James off..


Ya,that is what I thought happened. I never knew that Edward said that he killed James.
J<3B ~I <3 Ian~I<3Peeta~Team Zane RIP~I<3Fang
Image
Taylor's right bicep ~ http://www.teamtaycob.webs.com/
User avatar
runswithwolves
Officially Bitten!
 
Posts: 1578
Joined: Tue Oct 28, 2008 1:26 pm
Location: On Taylor's right bicep staring at the new Wolfpack picture

Re: Twilight Saga Q&A

Postby *Wanderer* » Mon Nov 17, 2008 10:22 pm

Um, who are we supposed to PM to tell them that this forum has reached over 100 pages?

Love,
*Wanderer* aka Emily
*Wanderer*
Ignoring Renee's E-Mails
 
Posts: 713
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2008 9:37 pm
Location: <3!

Re: Twilight Saga Q&A

Postby ilovetwilight » Mon Nov 17, 2008 10:59 pm

*Wanderer* wrote:Um, who are we supposed to PM to tell them that this forum has reached over 100 pages?

Love,
*Wanderer* aka Emily


hmm good question, lol, i have no idea.

HEY SOMEBODY WHO STARTS TOPICS, THIS FORUM IS OVER 100 PAGES!!!!!!!
Ok there. lol :lol:
Image
Active Donor for: DBJ & Co. (Dontating Blood to Jasper!)
Jackhammer Trainee for: EDC Inc. "Let's break down some houses"
Co-Captain for EDCCS!
User avatar
ilovetwilight
Ignoring Renee's E-Mails
 
Posts: 775
Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 3:41 pm
Location: California

Re: Twilight Saga Q&A

Postby Edward_Addict » Tue Nov 18, 2008 1:57 am

K so I have two kinda silly questions that I just thought I'd throw out there for fun :)

1.) Since vampires are basically made of stone and never age, do you think the female vamps still wear bras? I mean it's not like they need the support... :? LOL

2.) So vampires are supposed to smell good (to humans at least) as part of the allure to draw in prey. But since the Volturi and Romanians are so old and look so nasty, do you think they still smell good?? Ick
Image Image
User avatar
Edward_Addict
Completely Dazzled!
 
Posts: 1473
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2008 1:48 am
Location: Southern California

PreviousNext

Return to The Cullen Basement

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests

cron