Re: New Moon Movie ~ Take 3
Posted: Sun Jan 18, 2009 6:55 pm
yeah they should hurry next thing you know there will be girls at the directors door with pitchforks because they don't like who he rummored to cast
A Twilight Saga Fansite
https://forum.twilightlexicon.com/
I completely agree. Though the special effects in the movie could be amazing, it is really the story line that makes it. I hope that Kristen will be up to portraying the heartbreak that really makes the story, and I have faith that she will. As for the micalculations in Twilight, I personally believe that they couldn't be changed if they had a higher budget. As you said, money won't fix a flawed script or screenplay.Alison wrote: I'm very excited that the budget is higher, but I feel like some people are blaming the low budget for some of the miscalculations in Twilight. Some low budget movies are great! More money does mean more possibilities, but money isn't going to fix a flawed script or misguided direction. I just hope they do not let the large budget go to their heads and forget about the great story beneath the special effects.
Agreed. I hope that the special effects are better... Not that they weren't good in Twilight, just that they could have been better. But, I don't think that money will solve many things. It was the screenplay, script and I guess the storyboard. I just hope that the special effects are as awesome as the book makes them seem like they would be. Espically the cliff diving, wolves, Italy, and the motorcyles.CaseofCullen wrote:I completely agree. Though the special effects in the movie could be amazing, it is really the story line that makes it. I hope that Kristen will be up to portraying the heartbreak that really makes the story, and I have faith that she will. As for the micalculations in Twilight, I personally believe that they couldn't be changed if they had a higher budget. As you said, money won't fix a flawed script or screenplay.Alison wrote: I'm very excited that the budget is higher, but I feel like some people are blaming the low budget for some of the miscalculations in Twilight. Some low budget movies are great! More money does mean more possibilities, but money isn't going to fix a flawed script or misguided direction. I just hope they do not let the large budget go to their heads and forget about the great story beneath the special effects.
Hmmm I guess I have to re-read the book to remember what kind of age-frame I had in mind for them, since I don't think it's mentioned. There might be a better explanation on that on Stephenie Meyer's FAQ on her website.RussetRose♥ wrote:Yeah, I can't wait to see who plays the Volturi and the pack.
Here's a random question...
How old are the members of the Volturi supposed to be??
What? Are they like twenties or fifties. I always thought that they were in their fifties. Just because that's what I assumed. But, maybe since they are friends with Carlisle they are like his age...early twenties. Carlisle is twenty-three. Also, another point I just thought of. I don't know who many people heard the rumors that Ben Barnes is aiming for the role of Aro... But, this guy is definalty early twenties. So, I have no idea what to think...
Well I always pictured them old, it is never really specified. But I think they are supposed to be old since they were so popular for painters to admire, I would think that means they are gorgeous and young. Well not now, now they are all dusty lookingRussetRose♥ wrote:Yeah, I can't wait to see who plays the Volturi and the pack.
Here's a random question...
How old are the members of the Volturi supposed to be??
What? Are they like twenties or fifties. I always thought that they were in their fifties. Just because that's what I assumed. But, maybe since they are friends with Carlisle they are like his age...early twenties. Carlisle is twenty-three. Also, another point I just thought of. I don't know who many people heard the rumors that Ben Barnes is aiming for the role of Aro... But, this guy is definalty early twenties. So, I have no idea what to think...